 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
This is an article about a person, not about a network. Just because a person is a farmer, that doesn't make her belong in Category:Farming, nor do we put physicists in Category:Physics. Gene Nygaard (talk) 05:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- The approach depends upon the category. This category has two elements: "apostles" and their networks. They are coinherent; no apostle without a network, no apostolic network without an apostle. Because "apostle" is an office occupied by a person, and that office is established through planting churches and creating a network, I differ with your analysis. (All of this within the world-view of the apostolic network.) As evidence, I would suggest that the article about the apostle has a lot to say about the apostle's work, and the article about the network has a lot about the apostle.Hyper3 (talk) 10:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Interestingly enough, looking at Category:Physics I see Physicists is a subcategory. Hyper3 (talk) 11:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Christian Evangelicalism category edit
Looking at the contents of the category, in retrospect, I think I see your point - what would be better? Hyper3 (talk) 10:56, 22 December 2008 (UTC)