Talk:Georges Danton
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Old comment edit
This is very old fashionned and not really NPOV. Who feels to rewrite ?
I made a cut at it, but there are references to last names whose full names I don't know. Any help? -- Zoe
I will try to look at this but not now it's getting very late. Ericd 02:01 Apr 7, 2003 (UTC)
Roussel edit
Hi. I just added the passage about Roussel's Locus Solus in the "fictionalized accounts" section. Unfortunately, I can't remember if I've gotten the details of the arrangement with the executioner exactly right, but the section in Locus Solus pertaining to Danton's head and Roussel's fictionalized back-story is too fantastical to leave out of the wiki, especially since there's already a "fictionalized accounts" section.
As a side-note, the wiki really is in serious need of some organization and "clean-up." There seems to be a wealth of information, but it's highly inaccessible. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.95.39.34 (talk • contribs) 27 July 2006.
is this history? edit
why is the 1911 Britannica being referenced for goodness sake? How is that useful. Research has moved a bit in the last 110 years. Plus why is the article so weirdly disjointed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.112.52 (talk) 22:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)