Talk:George Rogers Park
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Lord Bolingbroke in topic Oregon Iron Company
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
George Rogers Park
editI've redirected Oswego Creek Bridge to this article for now, but a standalone article may be possible if there's enough sourcing. ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:52, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Oregon Iron Company
editHow much content should be kept here when there are existing articles for both Oregon Iron Company and Oregon Iron Company Furnace? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Most of the material should be merged. All of the information that's relevant to the park can probably be covered in one section—there's no need to have five subsections with a comprehensive chronology of the company. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Lord Bolingbroke, I agree. @Montanarynties: Are you willing to attempt trimming your recent additions to simply summarize content at the other existing articles? The park article should focus on the park site specifically, and not the company and furnace. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Esprqii, who nominated Oregon Iron Company for GA status, might have some input on what could be merged into that article. The "Rise and fall of Oregon Iron" section could be merged into Oregon Iron Company Furnace. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 21:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Lord Bolingbroke, I agree. @Montanarynties: Are you willing to attempt trimming your recent additions to simply summarize content at the other existing articles? The park article should focus on the park site specifically, and not the company and furnace. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:04, 15 March 2019 (UTC)