Talk:George Polk Awards

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2600:8800:2B80:255F:C024:1337:2E45:CA8E in topic Controversy over Polk's claims

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Polk Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Overly focused on 2015 awards edit

George Polk Awards have been given every year since 1948, yet more than half of this article is dedicated to the 2015 awards. That's massively undue. I think the section on the 2015 prizes should be renamed something like "Notable Awards" or "Historical Awards," and should give an overview of the most notable awards given in the history of the prize. That would entail deleting most of the information on the 2015 prizes, unless they really are the most notable prizes given since 1948. -Thucydides411 (talk) 19:56, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Controversy over Polk's claims edit

This detailed examination of claims made by and for Polk regarding his WW II service dates from 2007. https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/35737 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:2B80:255F:C024:1337:2E45:CA8E (talk) 20:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply