Talk:George Norcross
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 8 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
NPOV???? edit
Norcross isn't exactly the most popular political figure in New Jersey, but that still doesn't mean WP needs to run a hit piece on him. There are more weasel words in this article than I can count. Is Norcross mob-affiliated? Is he an instrument of corruption? If he is, cite yourself. If you can't, take that stuff out. But don't attack the man with innuendo. --Francisx 16:59, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, I don't even know anything about this guy but this has some major point of view problems.Bronayur 00:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Needs work edit
Norcross is a very important figure, and his entry should be far longer than this. It should be possible to write a much more extensive bio while preserving NPOV. I know there are Jersey political wonks out there who'd love to contribute... Mrwriter 21:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Read what Philadelphia Magazine has to say about George Norcross edit
www.phillymag.com/articles/they_have_no_choice/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by N. Regina (talk • contribs) 22:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Criticism edit
In case the criticism section gets removed by the subject of the article or someone closed connected to him, I am adding the idea of a criticism section to the Talk page. ("Chris Hedges has expressed that Norcross exerts out-sized and corrupt influence over Camden's politics and economy, using intimidation to keep local officials under control. The office of the Attorney General of New Jersey, in a string operation, recorded Norcross but he was never charged.") — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greeneditor491 (talk • contribs) 03:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on George Norcross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040807050751/http://politicsnj.com/murphy070102_statesenate.htm to http://www.politicsnj.com/murphy070102_statesenate.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on George Norcross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.alicetx.com/news/md-anderson-welcomes-new-members/article_0678bd5b-dd77-5199-a5af-fcee37bc9cb1.html - Added archive https://archive.is/20150204140944/http://archive.courierpostonline.com/article/20111215/NEWS01/111215014/Sandra-George-Norcross-pledge-5-million-Cooper-University-Hospital to http://archive.courierpostonline.com/article/20111215/NEWS01/111215014/Sandra-George-Norcross-pledge-5-million-Cooper-University-Hospital
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 14 December 2017 (UTC)