Talk:George Nenyi Andah
Latest comment: 6 years ago by 82.138.194.108 in topic Peacock and Lack of Sources
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Peacock and Lack of Sources edit
The article repeatedly (and without sources) refers to Andah with high praise for personal characteristics (His passion, his strong work ethic, his talents, his vast expertise) which are irrelevant to his professional history. Throughout, it reads like a particularly friendly workplace biography or an autobiographical entry. The reference section appears to be an uncited list of people who have worked with him and I'm unsure of the relevance of the hobbies section, as great as dogs are. --82.138.194.108 (talk) 13:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)