Talk:George Grenville

What's an MP?

"a group of young MPs associated with Lord Cobham." What's an MP and should we change the acronym to something most people would understand?
edit: Member of parliament: still, not a phrase some people might be used to. I'll let a registered user decide.

Untitled

George Greenville is a requested article...I think it's probably someone who wanted an article on this fellow. Should Greenville redirect here, or is that too distinct a spelling to make a redirect? Jwrosenzweig 04:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

I've never seen Grenville's name spelled that way. English spelling was fairly standardized in the 18th century. I see no especial reason for a redirect. john k 07:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

As additional information, I did two google searches, one that paired "george grenville" with "prime minister", and one that did the same for "george greenville". Grenville scored 18,000+ hits, Greenville 435. I'm personally a little on the fence...if Greenville appears that often, while it's clearly wrong, it's also potentially likely that someone would come here looking for him under that spelling. I have to believe that's why George Greenville is a requested article for the 18th Century. I appreciate your opinion, John, and if no one agrees with me, I'll leave it be, but I'm curious if there are any others with opinions. Also, is there a George Greenville I'm unfamiliar with who deserves his own article (and, perhaps, is the person actually being requested?)? Jwrosenzweig 23:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

What are the general guidelines for redirects for misspellings? I had thought that we don't have redirects for misspellings, but we obviously have some (Tony Bliar, for instance)...it seems like this is something we ought to have a general policy for, and not decide based on individual cases. john k 23:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

The guidelines, such as they are, are here: Wikipedia:Redirect. It's not good at distinguishing when we make such decisions. Do you think this is such a case? Jwrosenzweig 23:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

I've no idea. If you want to make the redirect, feel free. The alternate spelling seems common, even if wrong. john k 02:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

This article is really lacking information regarding his influence on the American colonists. (-history student who must now go elsewhere) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.235.12 (talk) 04:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

"PC"

Non-peers who are on the Privy Council do not affix the suffix "PC" after their names. The proper way to indicate that he was on the Privy Council is the prefix "The Right Honourable," which, as I understand it, is forbidden by current wikipedia conventions on strange egalitarian grounds. If we're not going to use "Right Honourable," we shouldn't use a made up suffix, either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.252.201 (talk) 15:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Grenville. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100926084501/http://britain.library4history.org:80/Andrews-Stuarts-Expansion/EXPANSION-OF-ENGLAND/John-Wilkes.html to http://britain.library4history.org/Andrews-Stuarts-Expansion/EXPANSION-OF-ENGLAND/John-Wilkes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 9 January 2017 (UTC)