Talk:George (magazine)

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Petzl in topic "George 2.0"

Jim Morrisson edit

How did Jim Morrisson contribute to this magazine? Didn't he die in 1971?

Removed Morrison's name, unless someone can come up with a good reason for it to be there. He died in 1971 and George wasn't first published until 1995.Laguna72 04:12, 19 July 2005 (UTC) Did it ever occur to you that there could be more than one person with that name? Jim is a very common name, and Morrison is a very common last name. 98.225.230.65 (talk) 12:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


There is a theory that JFK Jr was murdered because of his involvement in exposing the Israeli Prime Minister Rabin's murder conspiracy. George Magazine interviewed Geula Amir, the convicted assassin's mom.

Removed unsourced info. edit

I removed the following-On each issue's cover was hidden a tiny silhouetted head of George Washington as it appears on the U.S. quarter—a nod, perhaps, to the tiny rabbit head that graces the cover of each issue of Playboy. There are no sources for this at all and the bit about a nod to Playboy is ridiculous and unsourced as well.--BeckiGreen (talk) 20:19, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I removed "Marcus Goldfinch" from the contributors to the magazine. The edit that introduced him mentions he was with "George News in 2018". This has literally no connection to George Magazine at all. "George News" is a fringe conspiracy website and "marcus goldfinch" seems to be a troll addition related to a feud between that website and another obscure conspiracy theorist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cipheron (talkcontribs) 16:30, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dates edit

If the magazine was first published in 1995, how could Mathieu Berman have posed for it in 1991. Valetude (talk) 15:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Archive somewhere? edit

Is there a (free or not) digital archive of this anywhere? There's an article in it about the 200 movie "The Patriot" (Dunkel, Tom (July 2000). "Mel Gibson Pops an American Myth". George. pp. 70–71, 100–102.). I'd like to add a url if possible. Jimw338 (talk) 03:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Should remove sentence about purchase by Luis Silva de Balboa edit

This sentence "At the end, the trade mark and publishing rights were purchased by the South American tycoon Luis Silva de Balboa, who never published the magazine other than for private club members distribution." has no citation and I could not find any proof of it. The only references to Luis Silva de Balboa and the George magazine were exact copies of this wiki article except for one that states the offer to purchase the magazine by de Balboa and a partner was withdrawn. The article talks about their plan to use the staff to create a book about the Kennedy family and then close it down. This all occurred in 1999, two years before the magazine actually closed down. I could not find any proof of any sale. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.50.190 (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Significance of title? edit

What message was the magazine's title meant to put-out by referencing George Washington? It sounds a bit of a so-what. Valetude (talk) 01:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

"George 2.0" edit

Is it notable that George has, apparently, been rebooted?

For over a year, this reboot has published online and in print. georgemagazine.com is operational. It has the same logo as the original. Albeit, this version is extremely "redpilled", and has much lower visibility. Petzl (talk) 00:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply