Talk:Geography of Vatican City
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Ross Rhodes in topic Un-needed sections
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | The contents of the Extreme points of Vatican City page were merged into Geography of Vatican City. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Cleaned up a little from CIA import version
editI tried to clean the page up a little bit so that it did not look so much like (what it was) a direct import from the CIA.—MJCdetroit 13:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
St Peter's Square, disputed territory?
editHardly the most reliable source of information, but is it true that as claimed in Angels and Demons, that the square has been a bone of contention between the Vatican and Rome, and that Rome has periodically laid claim to it? --MacRusgail (talk) 19:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Un-needed sections
editIs there any point on having Natural resources and Natural Hazards sections in the article? All they say is that there is no resources or hazards. I think its a bit pointless having them there. Ross Rhodes (talk) 13:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)