Talk:Geographical feature

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Source 'MSRG' does not exsist. edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The source named in the title links to a 404, and the cite does not specify what source it is. Also, it appears to have linked to a policy page of an archaeology site. I don't think this source belongs. JamesJNHu (talk) 00:57, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Fixed with new website of MSRGPranav Mahajan 06:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pranavthgrt (talk • contribs) Reply

Excessive definitions? edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article may have excessive definitions. To me, it is nothing more than a dictionary entry of a general word with see-also's for the more precise words. I don't think this is encyclopedic. I'm not an expert on geology, but this doesn't seem like it has any content not included from another page. JamesJNHu (talk) 00:59, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic