Why are Samuels' opinions being layered through Buddhist articles? edit

Why? Seen his opinions in Karmapa controversy, in Tibetan Buddhism, and in Nyingma so far. Which are odd because his opinions are slightly weighted and bordering on mischaracterizations, as if his purpose is denigration. Yet it says here he's a scholar. Just wondering who's responsible so I can better understand. Pasdecomplot (talk) 18:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

And, why is his promotional page in Wikipedia?