Talk:Geoff Goodfellow

Untitled

I don't know about the 1992 reference but I read the New York Times article (don't know why the link here is broken). I don't know whether Geoff was first but he was certainly before NTP and he was before RIM. RadioMail was one of the first commercially available wireless email products and may have been the first available on the RAM Mobile Data mobitex network. This early work in wireless email may or may not qualify Geoff for Wikipedia. I don't think it was notable primarily because there is no proof of him being first (no patents and certainly the judgement NTP won against RIM points against his claim). However, I believe Geoff was a signifigant contributor to wireless email and is a wireless pioneer. Having said that, if this article remains it does need to be cleaned up and references cited properly.

RIM, NTP, and RadioMail

This article seems to give the impression that Geoff's meeting with NTP held to somehow keep the secret of RadioMail from RIM. RadioMail was no secret to RIM. In fact, you see that picture. That is a RIM Allpoints Card in that HP100LX. That card was created by RIM for use by RadioMail (and others but RadioMail was a big reason for creating the card). RIM knew Geoff Goodfellow well. RIM knew RadioMail well. I don't know this for certain but I would bet that Mike Lazaridis was a RadioMail user. I don't think anyone knew who NTP was until they started asking for licensing money and filing lawsuits. ZipIt 07:49, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Ya, and obviously NTP didn’t know who Geoff was so they interviewed him to see what 80’s stuff RIM may have uncovered. However, a few 80’s emails doesn’t challenge a gateway and router. What’s wrong with the NYT these days??!! Anyway, who said he’s a “self proclaimed” inventor. I think he would agree to being one of the first in the ARPANET community to express the idea but he knows very well that you can’t patent ideas – only methods which make them happen. RadioMail was a method and it was after NTP. So what about those 70’s amateur radio guys who were sending emails all over North America on their store and forward wireless packet radio nets? PDAgeek 02:45, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Heck, I have been around since 1985 in wireless and I never heard of NTP till they went after RIM. No one even mentions GDT in Vancouver and they were right there making a Windows RAMail version for Wireless Email in the early 90's. And they were doing wireless stuff long before that when they were MDT. That goes back to 1982. The patent thing is out of hand. I agree with Basille's article on Patent Reform. I would take it even further. I would not allow someone to keep a patent unless they are ACTIVELY pursuing building and marketing the invention. If we don't reform Patent Law in this country soon and do something about Patent Trolls then we are going to kill what patents were created to protect: Innovation! Innovation in this country is now rewarded by someone somewhere coming after you as soon as you have a little success and trying to take it away from you. It is totally unfair and makes you have to budget in legal fee as an equal component to marketing and development. All that money could be better spent inventing new products to make all our lives easier! Rdjordan 18:47, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree. Patent trolls are not adding anything to society and just pray on those that are making a success out of their creations. But as for Geoff. I agree he was a "visionary". I also believe he had some true inventions but since he chose at the time not to document the inventions by filing for a patent then I guess the world will never know. Maybe though, he has an idea there about not patenting things. You don't have to have a patent to protect yourself. You can just make your invention public and then no one can ever file a patent for that invention (See prior art)). Perhaps a Open Source type web site somewhere for people to document their ideas. Don't complain later if someone makes a profit off that idea. ZipIt 20:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Radiomaillogo.jpg

Image:Radiomaillogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ramail.jpg

Image:Ramail.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geoff Goodfellow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110817034400/http://geoff.livejournal.com/ to http://geoff.livejournal.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)