 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GenStat Discovery Edition edit
I agree that GenStat Discovery Edition should be merged with this article (see Talk:GenStat Discovery Edition). Engelec (talk) 12:33, 08:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
GenStat Article Sources edit
The article presents two sources neither of which is from an independent third party. The primary source is a press release for GenStat by the producing company, VSNi. The secondary source is a review article written by Roger Payne, the company's Chief Science and Technology Officer. Are there third-party reviews of the latest GenStat that could serve as sources for the article? 66.31.34.247 (talk) 11:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
- I can't see any reviews of the latest version, but there was a review of Genstat 9 in The American Statistician in 2007 doi:10.1198/000313007X219310. They also reviewed Genstat 5 in 1991 doi:10.2307/2684463. There's another review of Genstat 5 in a chemometrics journal doi:10.1016/0169-7439(87)80029-1. This 1999 book also appears to be an independent source. Qwfp (talk) 12:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Contested deletion edit
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because we would like to share more information that benefit for all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.53.151.88 (talk) 08:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Who is "we", please? Maproom (talk) 11:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- I have removed the notability template message. I came here after reading a blog entry from 2015 that implies the software is well-known ("If you want Genstat, you know where to find it: base R isn’t going to address everyone’s often-inconsistent needs", [1]). And the sources listed above show it has attracted attention over many years. JonH (talk) 11:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)