Talk:Genital piercing

This is not a site to arbitrarily post pictures of your genitals just because they are pierced. One picture should be enough to display one type of piercing.--Lamilli (talk) 15:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Dorsal and ventral confused?

There appears to be an error regarding the Prince Albert piercings: the text says that the Prince Albert is on the dorsal side but the photo shows a piercing on the ventral side. Conversely the text says that the Reverse Prince Albert is on the ventral side but the photo shows it on the dorsal side. I know which side is dorsal and which is ventral, but I'm not sure which PA piercing is supposed to on which side. If the photographs are correct then "dorsal" and "ventral" need to be switched in the text. If the text is correct then the photos need to be switched. Herbsttag (talk) 04:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

This has appropriate pics

Kids look at this website, and shouldn't be seeing these. Hatiebender (talk) 01:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

I think a lot of them should be taken out. Hatiebender (talk) 03:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

• Wikipedia is not censored WP:NOTCENSORED Wayne Jayes (talk) 11:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Thankfully we as a culture are fast outgrowing this level of sexual immaturity and learning instead to face the reality that we all have bodies, they’re all basically the same, and there’s nothing dirty or shameful about them. Plaintiger (talk) 01:37, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Unisex piercings

Why did someone delete them? They are piercings like the others. No reason to delete them. Who can restore them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:589:4706:C2D8:A462:AC50:B3A4:E907 (talk) 05:20, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Genital piercing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111122063400/http://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/point31.pdf to http://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/point31.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120325045125/http://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/thepoint44_web.pdf to https://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/thepoint44_web.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120203190651/https://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/thepoint_issue40_web.pdf to https://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/thepoint_issue40_web.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120203190716/https://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/thepoint41_web_uncensored.pdf to https://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/thepoint41_web_uncensored.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120203150146/https://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/thepoint_issue42_web1.pdf to https://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/thepoint_issue42_web1.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120203190803/https://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/thepoint_issue43_web.pdf to https://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/thepoint_issue43_web.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120325045125/http://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/thepoint44_web.pdf to https://www.safepiercing.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/thepoint44_web.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Misinformation

I don’t know who wrote this, but they seem to literally not know which way is up. I corrected two instances of their having reversed the terms “dorsal“ and “ventral“, and then had to replace an instance of the word “upper“ with “lower“! Very strange indeed. Plaintiger (talk) 01:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Outer labia piercing.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Pierced.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Entry image

I reverted the picture of the penis piercings at the top to the original image. This image is comparatively discreet and does not confront the reader with a huge penis pic in close-up when the article is first opened. There are detailed images below, broken down for each piercing. --Lamilli (talk) 09:11, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Again, I see no purpose of prominently placing an erect penis on the top of page, displaying an rather rare piercing.--Lamilli (talk) 09:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)