Talk:Genevieve Beacom
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kavyansh.Singh in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Genevieve Beacom appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 February 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Genevieve Beacom became the first woman to pitch in the Australian Baseball League when she made her debut for the Melbourne Aces in 2022? Source: [1]
Created by Therapyisgood (talk). Self-nominated at 00:07, 13 January 2022 (UTC).
Hi Therapyisgood, review follows: article created 12 January and exceeds minimum length; sources used are reliable for the subject and citations are inline throughout; article is well written; I didn't pick up on any overly close paraphrasing from the sources I could access (I don't have access to the NYT or Washington Post); hook is interesting, mentioned in the article, and checks out to sources; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 08:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Promoting the main hook (ALT0) to Prep 2 – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)