Talk:General Motors EV1
 | General Motors EV1 is currently a Transport good article nominee. Nominated by 750h+ at 01:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: Subcompact electric car |
 | General Motors EV1 was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 22, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the General Motors EV1 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2 |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | General Motors Impact was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 28 February 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into General Motors EV1. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:General Motors EV1/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: 750h+ (talk · contribs) 01:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 21:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Looking at sources first.
eBookit is a self-publishing company; we would need another reason to treat Edwards as reliable.- replaced
Similarly fox Xlibris (Ingersoll) and Lulu (Mortimer).
- replaced both
What makes greencarcongress.com a reliable source? It looks like a one-man operation.
- replaced with a Times Colonist source
Not necessarily a GA problem, but are FNs 122 and 128 really different sources?
- fixed
Will do spotchecks next, though that may not be today. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Mike Christie that should be good 750h+ 05:46, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- All struck; I went ahead and removed Mortimer from the sources list. I should be able to get to the spotchecks tonight or tomorrow morning. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)