This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Only when the lead is of sufficient length (i.e., several paragraphs), not just a few sentences, should any awards she has won be mentioned (not that she has any of real note, in my opinion). See Marilyn Monroe's article for guidance. I'm only going by the manual of style, which was the reason I removed the awards bumpfh in the beginning. - Dudesleeper / Talk 17:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
It wasnt the only thing you removed, you removed her roles too and just left a generic sentence [1]. How are we supposed to make the lead a "sufficient length" if you choose to remove everything from it? Whether you think her awards are of note is irrelevant. If her article covers them, which it does as there's a huge table in the middle of it, then it is perfectly reasonable to state that she has won awards in the lead, as it is supposed to be summarising the entire article.--GunGagdinMoan 19:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
My removal of the lead was because you can't be "best known" for multiple roles - it doesn't make sense. - Dudesleeper / Talk 19:41, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
If that's the case, then all you needed to do was remove one word, "best", not the entire lot.GunGagdinMoan 19:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nah, even known for is presumptuous. The current lead is marginally better. - Dudesleeper / Talk 20:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
