Talk:Gekkota

Merger proposal

Should this article be merged with Gecko? See Talk:Gecko#Doublet.3F FelixReimann (talk) 12:08, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

• This page was formally proposed by Arjuno3 (21 March 2016) for merger with Gecko.

• But the answer is do not merge. Because gecko is only one of the seven families under Gekkota, a valid suborder. Meaning that Wikilink from each family will redirect to gecko, which is absurd. Each taxon requires/derserves a separate page, unless it is monotypic. Chhandama (talk) 03:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC) Merge is my new opinion because, upon careful observation, the two pages are about the same thing really. And I thought they were about different taxons. Chhandama (talk) 02:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

• Oppose Are Pygopodidae species (legless lizards) really considered to be geckos? Mos definitions of gecko I've found restrict it to Gekkonidae. Calling the entire suborder Gekkota geckos appears to be a Wikipedia invention not followed elsewhere. Merging gecko/Gekkonidae might be appropriate, but not gecko/Gekkota.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gekkota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090513023543/http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu:80/site/accounts/classification/Gekkota.html to http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/classification/Gekkota.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 8 January 2017 (UTC)