Talk:Gebhard Truchsess von Waldburg/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Flawless, not a single error.

   B. MoS compliance:

   Perfectly executed, clear and concise.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Yes. Complies with WP:SOURCES.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Yes, all statistics and facts that may be quetioned have been cited.

   C. No original research:

   None.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Covers the major aspects of his life.

   B. Focused:

   Covers the minor and detailed aspects of his life.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Yes.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   No edit wars whatsoever. Quite stable editing pattern.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged.:

   Everything's in order.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Pictures show his life story well.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Excellent article, Ruth! Deserves to pass. Just one thing, is there much literature in regards to his personal life? It would be nice to have that extra little bit of detail. -- Jack1755 (talk) 21:10, 26 October 2009 (UTC)