Wikipedia

Talk:Bucharest Pride

(Redirected from Talk:GayFest)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Former good articleBucharest Pride was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 1, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
September 6, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 20, 2006Good article nomineeListed
June 24, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 2, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the GayFest of 2005 was the first LGBT pride parade in Romania?
Current status: Delisted good article

Some sources

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

bogdan 11:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

"The hardest disease"

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What did the signs say in Romanian that is translated here as "hardest"? "Cel mai tare"? "Cel mai greu"? Either way, I'd be inclined to guess that we should say in English "the worst disease", because they were probably making reference to the English-language song "Homophobia" by Chumbawamba: "Homophobia: the worst disease / You can't love whom you want to love in times like these." - 07:14, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

I don't know what the signs said in Romania (I can't access the source I used for this anymore) but I agree that "the worst disease" is a much better translation. Thanks!    Ronline ✉ 07:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Failed GA

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Not so much a failure, just a technical violation: its nominator, ROnline, has also contributed significantly to the article — OK for FA candidates but not for GAs. Someone else has to do it.

It's an excellent, well-sourced, well-illustrated article that could well meet the criteria. I suggest lengthening the intro, particularly the second graf, to include some of the material on related news events such as the counterdemos that's in the article. Daniel Case 03:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

That's a misunderstanding - you cannot REVIEW your own articles, you can nominate them at will, in fact most of the nominations are from editors, and it is actually even better that way (not that I think this is the right place to expand upon that). So, if you want to give the article a proper review, please do so (provided you haven't contributed to it too). Bravada, talk - 23:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Alright, I have cleared up my musinderstanding and I'm passing this one. With that out of the way, I have no significant objections, just suggestions for improvement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Case (talk • contribs)
Nice of you to pass (even if you forgot to sign), but you need to provide a review too, commenting on how it fulfills GA criteria. Bravada, talk - 00:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA Status

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The same anon editor who removed the GA tag also added it to the WP:GA list, which was then reverted along with another article he passed that hadn't been nominated as vandalism. As such, I came by to check this out. The GA status of this article is odd- it was passed without a review, and then an editor posted an edit summary saying he was removing said pass, but didn't actually do it. Turns out though, that GayFest was actually already at WP:GA in a different section, so, to clear up any confusion, I'm going to give this article an actual review, so that it doesn't get it's status revoked when the editors that are currently checking up on the GA's come through.

So...

I judged this article on 7 criteria:

  1. Well-written: Pass
  2. Factually accurate: Pass
  3. Broad: Pass
  4. Neutrally written: Pass
  5. Stable: Pass
  6. Well-referenced: Pass
  7. Images: Neutral

Congratulations, it passes. I think the article has a couple of images that are unneeded and are just used for decoration, bu it's not enough that I would fail a nom for it, and it's certainly not enough for me to revoke GA status for. --PresN 17:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

WHY do homosexuals use the rainbow?

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I want to be able to wear the rainbow and not be called GAY! And no, I'm not a homophobe! I just want to be STRAIGHT!

If you read the article on rainbow flag, you'll find out that this flag is not exclusively used by the LGBT community, but also represents peace and some ethnic groups, for example. The reason why this flag is used by LGBT people is because it represents diversity and hope, two important values in the context of gay rights and LGBT culture. Ronline ✉ 07:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Sweeps Review: On Hold

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. However, in reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that need to be addressed. I have made minor corrections and have included several points below that need to be addressed for the article to remain a GA. Please address them within seven days and the article will maintain its GA status. If progress is being made and issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted. If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. To keep tabs on your progress so far, either strike through the completed tasks or put checks next to them.

Needs an inline citation:

  1. "The impulsion or luring of another person in viewing the practice of sexual relations between persons of the same sex, as well as propaganda or any other acts of proselytism for the same purpose are punishable with imprisonment between one and five years."
  2. "The idea behind the festival was to offer some transparency for the gay community in Romania. This will be a week in which we will celebrate the right to be different from the majority while at the same time having solidarity with the rest of society. Romania must show that it lives in the Europe of 2004."
  3. "The parade was, however, supported by the Metropolitan Community Church in Bucharest, with the church's pastor, Diane Fisher, making a keynote address."

Other issue:

  1. Expand the lead a bit more to better summarize the article. See WP:LEAD for guidelines.
  2. The 2008 GayFest is not described as much as the prior events. Expand the section a bit more with any available information.

This article covers the topic well and if the above issues are addressed, I believe the article can remain a GA. I will leave the article on hold for seven days, but if progress is being made and an extension is needed, one may be given. I will leave messages on the talk pages of the main contributors to the article along with the related WikiProject so that the workload can be shared. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Sweeps Review: Failed

edit

Unfortunately, since the issues I raised were not addressed, I have regrettably delisted the article according to the requirements of the GA criteria. If the issues are fixed, consider renominating the article at WP:GAN. With a little work, it should have no problems getting back up to GA status. If you disagree with this review, you can seek an alternate opinion at Good article reassessment. If you have any questions let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

About Gay Fest

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hii Everyone — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.73.77.22 (talk) 05:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Bucharest Pride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:49, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 27 external links on Bucharest Pride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bucharest Pride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Bucharest Pride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:21, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Bucharest Pride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bucharest Pride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bucharest Pride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bucharest_Pride&oldid=1200416393"