Talk:Gay, Georgia

population: 139:

According to Viacom's Cbs' Logo|Logo (TV channel)'s Advocate Newsmagazine, Directtv #263:

population: 139.

Hopiakuta 02:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Experiment,_Georgia

Hopiakuta 02:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Not sure what Experiment, GA has to do with Gay, since Experiment is nowhere near Gay and in a different county. McGehee 04:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gay, Georgia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6G4J8TS75?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

vandalization!

i think this article needs to have a lock in place, this is a shared ip and even still this page has been vandalized by people using it 68.204.71.46 (talk) 23:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

There is actually relatively little vandalism of this article - much less than one such edit per day. That's well below the level at which an administrator would be willing to put semi-protection on an article. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 15:28, 7 January 2019 (UTC)