Armenian users should stop removing information about Gata in other countries.

edit

Direct quote from one of the sources added before me by Armenian users (Great Russian encyclopedia):

"in the most complete range are produced in Iran, Afghanistan and Turkey. To a lesser extent, they are common in the Arab East - in Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, where dried fruits (eg, dates, figs) are consumed more. In Europe, V. with. are made in Bosnia, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Greece, Romania. V. s. common in Transcaucasia (especially in Armenia and Azerbaijan) and West Asia (mainly in Tajikistan)."

Adding source citing about Gata being spread in other countries, but then removing information about every country except Armenia is unreasonable. Piskov123 (talk) 16:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

You're not allowed to edit in this area, see your talk page. And whatever you add, removing other sources without reason, and editing content while removing its cited source is a major editing problem, so I reverted you. Last but not least, tertiary sources (such as encyclopedias) are generally not preferred per wiki policies, especially the likes of the successor of the Great Soviet encyclopedia. The general idea is to not use them for specific claims if there are secondary sources. But you shouldn't be editing this topic area regardless, again see your talk page as to why. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 13:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Great Russian Encyclopedia were cited as source before my first edit on this page. I added information based on existing source. And if you're reverting my edits, then start from my first edit on this article (12 february 2023), to the point when this page didn't even have images in it.
So, if i'm not yet allowed to edit this article, it would be kind of you if you did that for me and added proper information about spreading of Gata in countries other than Republic of Armenia. Thank you. Piskov123 (talk) 13:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Cultural Origin and Representation of Gata

edit

I am writing to address recent edits made to the "Gata" article, which now presents this pastry as exclusively Armenian in origin. While Gata may have strong associations with Armenian cuisine, it is important to recognize and acknowledge the shared culinary heritage in the region.

Cuisines, much like cultures, are often a blend of influences and shared traditions. Many foods, including Gata, Lahmacun, and Sucuk, transcend national boundaries and are enjoyed in various forms across neighboring cultures. It is crucial that our article reflects this diversity and interconnectedness.

I propose that we revisit these recent edits with a focus on inclusivity and factual accuracy. Let us collaborate to ensure the article:

Reflects Multiple Perspectives: The article should acknowledge the different variations of Gata found in neighboring countries and cultures. This can be achieved by citing reliable sources that discuss these variations.

Maintains Neutral Language: We should avoid language that exclusively attributes Gata to a single nation or culture. Instead, we can describe its presence and significance in various regions.

Cites Reliable Sources: Any claims about the origin or cultural significance of Gata should be supported by credible and verifiable sources. This includes academic publications, reputable culinary historians, and recognized food experts.

Encourages Cultural Appreciation: Instead of focusing on divisive narratives, let's highlight how Gata, as a food item, serves as a bridge between cultures, showcasing a shared heritage that deserves celebration.

I believe that by approaching the article with a spirit of cooperation and mutual respect, we can create content that is not only informative but also respectful of the rich, diverse culinary traditions in the region. For an example please see Arepa. Göycen (talk) 21:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply