This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Wolfgang Voigt page were merged into Gas (musician) on March 2, 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
forest theme
editthe article at present makes no mention of the unifying theme of the konigsforst near cologne, which voigt has spoken about at length as being the inspiration for the project (in a wire mag interview from last year). i've created the album pages tonight, but i'll try and expand when i dig out the relevant issue. --Kaini (talk) 23:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- heh, one of the articles i've cited is an interview with voigt in which one of the questions is "In your Wikipedia entry, whoever wrote it says: "Because Gas music lacks any trace of melody or chord change, many would not describe it as *musical*." How would you respond to the writer of the article -- and where do you personally draw the line between "musical" and "non-musical," if there is such a line?". lol, a perfect example of the vast feedback loop that is the internets. kinda fitting. --23:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Gas vs. the rest of Voigt
editWhat is the difference between Gas and the rest of Voigt's work? The article has Gas ending in 2000; however, according to a few things[1] he still uses the name "Gas" for live performances and such. Also, here's a pretty interesting lecture that perhaps could be used as a source or an external link: http://www.redbullmusicacademy.com/video-archive/lectures/wolfgang_voigt_gas_amp_killer . Wickethewok (talk) 02:55, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- he retired the name after pop, pretty much. that is, until the release of the box set this year. and as a followon to that, voigt gave his first live performances as gas this year, mixing gas material in ableton while a big screen projected images of the konigsforst. there's a good review in the wire which i must dig out. --Kaini (talk) 02:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- ...voigt's stuff was very varied (he doesn't release as much now, but in the 90s he had more aliases than aphex...) mike ink was acid stuff, mostly, he had a few minimal aliases including M:I:2 as well... --03:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- ...and as a final thought, the gas stuff is probably unique in his effort to integrate traditional german stuff, really idiosyncratic things for electronic music like oompah and lieder not only within voigt's stuff but electronic music in general. that's a good interview btw. he's very articulate. --Kaini (talk) 03:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- ...voigt's stuff was very varied (he doesn't release as much now, but in the 90s he had more aliases than aphex...) mike ink was acid stuff, mostly, he had a few minimal aliases including M:I:2 as well... --03:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
"non-musical"
edit"Most of the time there is no clear musical progression in a Gas track and, because it lacks any trace of orthodox melody or chord change, many would not describe it as musical."
Can we just take this line out? It's not sourced, it's someone's rather unorthodox opinion, and more importantly, it's just a load of rubbish. Thoughts? tomasz. 13:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)