Talk:Gas-generator cycle

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


ISP and efficiency

edit

This article seems to have conflicting information regarding ISP and efficiency:

"The gas generator turbine does not need to deal with the counter pressure of injecting the exhaust into the combustion chamber, this allows the turbine to produce more power and increase the pressure of the fuel and combustion chamber, thus increasing specific impulse or efficiency.

Ok, so the cycle allows for higher ISP.

"The main disadvantage is lost efficiency due to discarded propellant, though this efficiency loss can be outweighed in production engines by the higher chamber pressure's increase in net efficiency. Even so a gas generator cycle tends to have lower specific impulse than a Staged combustion cycle."

Ok, so it leads to lower ISP, except when it doesn't. Even so, it tends to.

I'm confused. Djd sd (talk) 00:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gas-generator cycle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Could rearrange the Usage section

edit

It would seem better to list the rocket launch systems on the same lines as the engines they use. Could even change to a 2 column table, or even add extra engine related columns eg for dates, thrusts ? Any objections ? - Rod57 (talk) 15:51, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gas-generator cycle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gas-generator cycle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply