Talk:Gary Suter/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 23:41, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

I'll be happy to take this one; sorry you've had to wait so long for a review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-5 days. -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:41, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

S'alright. All part of the process. I will be out of town from Friday night until next Thursday, so there may be a delay in my response, depending on the timing. Thanks! Resolute 00:03, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for letting me know. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:55, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Checklist

On an initial pass, this looks outstanding--not simply a Good Article, but actually a good article. While many sports articles turn into collections of stats, this gives a good narrative sense of Suter's career. I still have a few checks to do, but this seems ripe for promotion. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:24, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Well. That was easy!  ;) Thanks for the review, and the barnstar! Resolute 02:37, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

My pleasure--thanks again for writing it. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:59, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Spotchecks show no evidence of copyright issues.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	N/A
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	N/A
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass as GA