Talk:Gary Sambrook

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Julle in topic Neutrality

Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2020 edit

  Done

In the section 'In October 2020, Sambrook voted against extending free school meals to eligible children during school holidays.[6] This could have helped over 6,000 children within his constituency.[7] In response, a vicious graffito appeared in his constituency reading "Gary Sambrook eats big dinners".[8]' Remove the unnecessary word 'vicious' as it is subjective and there is no evidence to support it. Philistine055 (talk) 21:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Removed. DuncanHill (talk) 22:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality edit

"This could have helped over 6,000 children within his constituency" is not a neutral statement, given that it indicates that 6000 children went unhelped. That particular sentence should probably just be deleted. /Julle (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'd normally have waited longer, but since this was a (perceived) POV problem in a BLP article, I went ahead and removed it now. Politics can always benefit one group or another; we normally don't indicate a decision as a refusal to help someone. /Julle (talk) 10:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Grammar edit

Please stop reverting simple grammar changes, if you require explaination of why grammar edits have been made, speak about it on the talk page before reversion.