Talk:Gary Lambert (politician)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Cooljeanius in topic "Controversy" section
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Controversy" section edit
The "Controversy" section recently added by User:Minority Reporters seems to be disproportionate to the rest of the article. Read Wikipedia:Controversy sections for why this is a problem. The question, then, is how to fix it. Should the section be removed or rewritten, or should more positive material be added to balance it out? I'm leaning towards the latter, seeing how short the article already is, but I am unsure as to what positive material exists that could be used for this purpose... Perhaps something from the Concord Monitor's endorsement of Lambert? Link: Editorial: Lambert is the right choice for the GOP. Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 17:44, 2 September 2014 (UTC)