Talk:Gary Keedy

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

First Cite Tag edit

Is this considered a reliable source? Although not copied the 2004 performance and the All Out Cricket bits appear to have escences of the Wikipedia article. --Jpeeling (talk) 15:52, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think it counts as a reliable source. Mostly I've been involved in adding sources to the article (and the table at the bottom) rather than writing prose. Which website seems to be a little too close to this article? Nev1 (talk) 15:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
I meant the benefit year website, but I think I was just being paranoid. Thanks. --Jpeeling (talk) 16:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gary Keedy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply