Additional affiliations

edit

Cohn is involved in other organizations. I believe this is wiki-worthy and part of what an encyclopedia should be included in the article. Please give guidance on the best way to include the information which can be sourced to the organizations themselves, and not necessarily in a third party source. I tried to add the following two bits of info: a)Mr. Cohn is a member of the International Advisory Panel of the Monetary Authority of Singapore, (MAS). b)Mr. Cohn serves as a trustee and chair of the NYU Langone Musculoskeletal Advisory Board. the references are to: http://www.mas.gov.sg/about-mas/overview/advisory-committees/international-advisory-panel and http://nyulangone.org/press-releases/over-62-million-raised-nyu-langone-medical-centers-2014-violet-ball Factsonlyplease39 (talk) 06:43, 5 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Factsonlyplease39, if he is involved in other organizations in a meaningful and important way, then secondary sources will have written it up, and those are the ones that should be cited. Without such sources it's just you (and him, probably) who thinks that those affiliations are important--so that's either OR or just resume writing. Secondary sources is the name of the game. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 14:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Close connection

edit

User:Brianhe: You added a close connection tag in June 2015. It's now February 2016 and it's still there. I think we should try to be more constructive and find ways to remove it. What sounds particularly POV to you? Is it the "personality and work style" subsection?Zigzig20s (talk) 03:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Investment Banker

edit

Should title of page be changed? He's now more famous as Trump advisor than his former position. | MK17b | (talk) 22:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

So what name would you propose? | MK17b | (talk) 21:48, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Sry, I'm new to wikipedia and didn't really even notice your answer. (I'm now watching the page so should probably see changes when i'm logged in from now on.)
To your question: I really don't know. I thought his full name - Gary David Cohn/Gary D. Cohn - would be unique and clear, but that doesn't match with wiki-policies from what i can gather (much less recognizable and natural than investment banker). If he really becomes FED-chair that would probably work, but until then it be quite a while. "Trump-administration-official" would be an improvement imo and probably the best candidate, but not very concise, so don't know if that's ok. (Not aquainted with how strictly people cling to the guidelines usually during this whole "consensus"-thing) and otherwise i think "Trump-official" is probably to casual and few know what the NEC in a title "Gary Cohn (NEC-director) would mean. Editingthings (talk) 20:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Possibly misleading wording

edit

In the introduction it says "Cohn is a registered Democrat, but has donated extensively to the Republican Party.[3]". This is completely true, but might be a bit misleading, especially with the "but" after the registered Democrat, so that one might find it implied, that, while he is a registered Democrat, his donation record would place him rather with the Republicans (than the democrats). This would not be true/complicated as Cohn has all in all contributed a bit more to Democrats, although his more recent donations go more to Republicans (1).

I would propose changing the wording a bit to one of the following (changes in bold):
- Cohn is a registered Democrat, but has donated extensively to Republicans and Democrats. (did donate to candidates, not just the party; see opensecrets-link)
- Cohn is a registered Democrat, but has donated extensively to both parties.
- Cohn is a registered Democrat, but has donated extensively to the Republican Party as well. (best in my opinion)

If nobody has any concerns/alternatives I will probably change the article in the next days (you can go ahead if you want)
+ Is he really still a registered Democrat?

(1) source: https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-11-29/goldman-s-cohn-to-meet-with-trump-amid-transition-consultations; starting third paragraph after Goldman Sachs as sub-headline. More recent most to Republicans strongly implied, but not definitely stated ("But he’s also donated more than $225,000 to Republicans, with most of the money coming in recent years."). If I understood opensecrets-search correctly, that is his donation record, if sb. wants to and go through it independetly (didn't do it myself exactly as of now; alternative to open-secrets e.g. http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/gary-cohn.asp?cycle=16).
--Editingthings (talk) 14:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

New Section Needed for Trump admininstration

edit

Would someone please add.--Wikipietime (talk) 12:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

order of article (chronological)

edit

Aren’t biographies mainly written in chronological order? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Biographies also says “In general, present a biography in chronological order, from birth to death, except where there is good reason to do otherwise. Within a single section, events should almost always be in chronological order.”
So probably the sections “National Economic Council director” and “Career” should be switched. (Don’t know exactly what good reason means, but in the Hitler or Obama biography they also seem to follow chronological order, while Hitler’s early artistic ambitions are probably overshadowed by later events.) If nobody says anything contrary and the order hasn’t been changed yet, I would probably change it in the next days.
Editingthings (talk) 18:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

I have now switched the sections. I have basically only cut, copied & pasted the sections, but as I did it in the visual-editor there are minor changes to the “code”.
Pls feel free to switch back, but leave some sort of reasoning as to why.I have also renamed the section “Career” to “Business Career” – analogous to the Donald Trump wiki-article - as it’s probably (?) unlikely that anyone would consider his govt-work not part of his professional career.
The section “Personality and work style” could also possibly be integrated into the “Business Career” or even the “Goldman Sachs”-subsection as it really only describes his behavior there if somebody wants to do it. I think the current way is slightly better (1), but don’t really care, just in case somebody wants to do it.
(1) work style could obviously still be the same and that might be of interest for those looking for info on the Trump-administration/Trump-administration-officials and don’t read the GS-part + one could see it as an important aspect of the person that shouldn’t be filed simply in the Career-section.

Editingthings (talk) 20:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Resignation Rumors

edit

Are well sourced Wikipietime (talk) 09:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The BLP needs those. Wikipietime (talk) 09:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rumors are rumors until verified, when they are no longer rumors but facts. See WP:NOTRUMOUR. Marquardtika (talk) 02:43, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gary Cohn (investment banker). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply