Talk:Garry Schyman/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 17:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Article is well written and complies to MoS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References appear to comply to WP:RS and all major statements are properly cited.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   The article appears to be stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Unfortunately there are no images available, however, this is not a requirement of GA.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Summary: There are no issues with this article, and it passes all the requirements on the checklist. As such, I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. -- S Masters (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2010 (UTC)