 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Copyright problem edit
This article has been tagged as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) It will likely be deleted after one week unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Major contributions by contributors who have been verified to have violated copyright in multiple articles may be presumptively deleted in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations.
Interested contributors are invited to help clarify the copyright status of this material or rewrite the article in original language at the temporary page linked from the article's face. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. --MER-C 18:08, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- What exactly is the copy-vio text in this, MER-C? Because the subject seems notable. SilverserenC 05:10, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- The article was majority written by a massive copyright violating sockpuppeteer. Policy says I do not need to look for a copyvio for the offending text to be deleted. It looks like this will be a stubbing instead of an outright deletion. MER-C 10:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- What are you going to stub? The article states basic facts about the subject and includes a quotation. What part of any of that is copyvio-possible? SilverserenC 13:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Well I can't find any copyvios to remove. The article has already been practically rewritten since Anglo Pyramidologist last touched it. Have removed the template. – Joe (talk) 05:22, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- What are you going to stub? The article states basic facts about the subject and includes a quotation. What part of any of that is copyvio-possible? SilverserenC 13:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- The article was majority written by a massive copyright violating sockpuppeteer. Policy says I do not need to look for a copyvio for the offending text to be deleted. It looks like this will be a stubbing instead of an outright deletion. MER-C 10:51, 20 December 2022 (UTC)