Talk:Garratt v. Dailey
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Leafcathead in topic Outcome after remanded for clarification
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editWorst brief I've ever read. Read the full case and brief this case yourself: Garratt v. Daily [46 Wash.2d 197].
- WP:SIG To (192.195.155.90), Kindly sign your posts. Wermsker (talk) 06:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Reboot
editSeveral years of edits since (192.195.155.90)'s "worst" comment (supra) has done little to improve this topic. I've rebooted the topic with ground-up rewrite. Wermsker (talk) 06:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Outcome after remanded for clarification
editThe article claims that "Subsequently, the trial Court found in favor of Garratt and was affirmed by the state Supreme Court." but there is citation. I cannot verify this information. I think it should be removed unless someone can find an actual source. Leafcathead (talk) 20:04, 7 August 2024 (UTC)