Talk:Gardens by the Bay MRT station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello (note this is my first time doing this, so bear with me ;)), my name is Brachy0008 and I’m the (surprise) reviewer for Gardens by the Bay MRT station.

Is it well written?

1. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: , surprisingly great for a stub. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
2. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: , no issues found. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Is it verifiable with no original research?

1. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: , no issues Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
2. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: , Sources are largely government publications or reliable news media. Well done! Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
3. It contains no original research: , no issues found after some spotchecks. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
4. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: , no issues. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Is it broad in its coverage?

1. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: , explains the main aspects, like its openings, construction and location. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
2. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): , everything is relevant to topic and summarised. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Is it neutral?

It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: , no words to watch present and no biased sources of information. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Is it stable?

It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: , no edit war so far. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

1. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: , All images are appropriately licensed, either uploaded directly by contributors to Commons, or uploaded from a blog which has stated images are licensed there under a compatible Creative Commons license. Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
2. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: , all images are relevant pictures of the station, aerial or landscape. Well done! Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Overalls

Pass or fail?: You pass! Well done! Brachy08 (insert welcoming to chat with you message here) 05:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)