Talk:Galyani Vadhana

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Please consult Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Thailand-related articles)#Cast votes 217.140.193.123 16:24, 26 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Arrigo has moved this article despite the request posted down to please post a discussion on moving first. Requesting restoration of original name until clear rules are there. Arrigo please stop moving articles that are under renanming discussion or removing naming tags. You have done this on plenty of other occassions. Gryffindor  15:24, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

if renaming of this article is considered, please post a discussion first and do not simply move the article without posting a Wikipedia:Requested moves first, thank you. Antares911 13:36, 22 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Readers may be interested in to know that User:Antares911 above is the former username of User:Gryffindor (also above). 217.140.193.123 20:43, 26 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose the requested move from Galyani Vadhana to Princess Galyani Vadhana of Thailand. Unnecessary and cluttering. One of the highest forms of respect is to name a person using only the pure royal name. Such as Bhumibol Adulyadej, or Chulalongkorn. Using such simple name implies that the person in question is well-known without any additions. To accord the same to Thai royals signifies the high respect of recognizing the person in question just by his one name. All additions are basically cluttering the respect. Purity is respect, clutter is disrespect. Therefore all additions (be it territorial designation such as "of Thailand" or "of Siam", titulary such as king or queen, a surname, or whatever) are clutter, and should be avoided if not necessary for disambiguation. I oppose all the clutter alternatives. Arrigo 10:15, 27 August 2005 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. We don't put the word "Princess" or the like in the page title. CDThieme 16:41, 30 August 2005 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose use of "Princess" per Thieme above; oppose use of Thailand as unnecessary for disambiguation. Septentrionalis 21:05, 31 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. Dragons flight 03:04, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

misc

edit

The name of HH Prince Varananda Dhavaj need to fix. People who get the title HH (His Highness) isn't a prince anymore. He was born in royal family but his royalty isn't as high as to be a prince.--Pudtipong 05:59, 26 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Death

edit

My sources are reporting that she died on November 11th or 12th, 2007. Actual news of her death will be reported AFTER the king's birthday celebration in December. --Che1959 10:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Stamp image

edit

Unfree stamps can only be used to illustrate articles relating to the stamp itself, not things depicted on it. See {{Non-free stamp}}. David Mestel(Talk) 09:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image File:Logo pnu new.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:30, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:The Royal Great Victory Carriage with Princess Galyani's royal urn .jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:The Royal Great Victory Carriage with Princess Galyani's royal urn .jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:58, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Galyani Vadhana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Galyani Vadhana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Galyani Vadhana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Galyani Vadhana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply