Talk:Gallox Bridge, Dunster

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gallox Bridge, Dunster/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 20:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

I'll have this one to you within a day ☠ JAGUAR ☠ 20:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

• "The bridge is in the guardianship of English Heritage" - this is mentioned in the lead but not anywhere else in the article

• Added at the end of history.— Rod ^talk 18:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

• "below 'the castle at a point" - would be better linked fully as Dunster Castle

• Done.— Rod ^talk 18:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

• The lead could be expanded slightly in order to summarise the article and comply per WP:LEAD. A little bit more can be mentioned about the bridge's history I think, for example "It was important for the transport of wool and other goods to market" could be expanded a little into how it dates back to 1222 and when the bridge was built etc

• It already says 15th century for the construction but I've added a few words as suggested.— Rod ^talk 18:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

• The Architecture section is a little short to pass the GA criteria, can it at all be expanded? By a sentence or two?

• I'm still looking for more to add here.— Rod ^talk 18:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

• I've been back through the sources and added a few words, but I really can't find anything else on the architecture.— Rod ^talk 17:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

References

• Ref 4 is dead
• The external link is dead too

• I've fixed the linkrot but the expansion suggested above will take a day or two.— Rod ^talk 17:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks Rod, that's OK, the expanion does't have to be anything major - I was thinking a little more detail could be added to meet the GA criteria ☠ JAGUAR ☠ 17:26, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

On hold

This is a well researched article and a compact one too. It is well written but I feel that it does not meet the comprehensivness part of the crtiera at this time, so I'll put this on hold until all of the above can be addressed. Thanks! ☠ JAGUAR ☠ 12:00, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Close - promoted

Thank you for taking the time to make improvements to this article, I think the architecture should be fine as I see the rest of the article is well researched and well written, so I think this passes the GA criteria. Well done on the extra work, looks like another Somerset GA! ☩JAGUAR ☩ 17:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Just looked at the picture again and I've crossed this bridge several times! ☩JAGUAR ☩ 17:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gallox Bridge, Dunster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150518101823/http://services.english-heritage.org.uk/ResearchReportsPdfs/038_2014WEB.pdf to http://services.english-heritage.org.uk/ResearchReportsPdfs/038_2014WEB.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gallox Bridge, Dunster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131225020003/http://www1.somerset.gov.uk/archives/hes/downloads/Somerset_EUS_Dunster.pdf to http://www1.somerset.gov.uk/archives/hes/downloads/Somerset_EUS_Dunster.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gallox Bridge, Dunster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714163433/http://www.dunsterestate.co.uk/things-to-see-do/see-dunster-estate/gallox-bridge/ to http://www.dunsterestate.co.uk/things-to-see-do/see-dunster-estate/gallox-bridge/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://pastscape.english-heritage.org.uk/hob.aspx?hob_id=36854

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)