This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article contradicts itself, extolling the ability of the gaiwan to facilitate multiple infusions of oolong tea in the one paragraph, and then calling it "unsuitable" for brewing oolong in the next paragraph because too much heat will escape.
This should be cleaned up, and ideally sourced, but informally speaking, the former is common practice and the latter is incorrect.24.18.223.55 (talk) 12:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Terrible understanding of the Gaiwan and the culture of tea in this articleedit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Firstly the gaiwan is not a 焗盅. The latter is a different utensil although there are people confused with the names and the look of the two.
Secondly the original model of the gaiwan came about in Tang dynasty though the modern form is perfected during Ming.
Thirdly, during Tang dynasty the tea was not brewed, so the size of the tea bowl in those days was not due to the "implementation" of brewing.
Fourthly, there were no "tea ritual" requirements during Ming for a gaiwan to be designed. It was developed for utilitarian objectives.
Fifthly, I do not know if the writer means to say whether the tool is used for oolongs or whether it is for green or white tea, cause he/she said two contradicting lines. A gaiwan is actually a versatile tool for preparing most kinds of tea by way of steeping.
This article is not an appropriate or accurate representation of the tea ware category and should be re-written.
Kwanchungleung (talk) 15:40, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply