A fact from Gaius Junius Bubulcus Brutus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 March 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is currently no article on the Roman goddess Salus, who is not so closely identified with Greek Hygeia as that article indicates. I hope to post an article on Salus soon. Cynwolfe (talk) 21:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
There's nothing in here about his family or his early life. While it is hinted that nothing is known about that, if it is true, the article should say so.
--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 22:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Actually, to make that statement would require a secondary source; otherwise, it's original research to infer only on the basis of one's own efforts that nothing is known. A Wikipedian's failed efforts to find information is not an indication that it doesn't exist, if you see what I mean. So in writing these biographical articles, I don't state "little is known" unless my secondary sources have asserted as much, because I might just be making a statement only of my own limitations. Does that make any sense? Cynwolfe (talk) 22:55, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
