Talk:Gabriel Turville-Petre/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Krakkos in topic GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 03:37, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 17:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 


Observations edit

Final edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): (Good expression)
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): (extensively referenced, appropriate)
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused): (For Icelandic, Old Norse, and related language acquisition - Germanic, Irish, Welsh, Gothic, very broad)
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: (Neutrality is observed)
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.: (Stable article, no edit wars in history)
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): (All images cited in public domain or CC by SA)
  7. Overall:
  • A well researched and referenced article on the contributions of Gabriel Turville-Petre to Old Norse literature. Makes good use of Foote, (Proceedings of the British Academy) and O'Donoghue (DNB). Origins of Icelandic Literature and Myth and Religion of the North along with the students he taught are testaments to his industry and accomplishments.       --Whiteguru (talk) 05:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

 Passed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.