Talk:Gabriel Liiceanu

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Tgeorgescu in topic "Andreescu Critique" Legitimacy

Revolution? edit

Can somebody explain why is Liiceanu included in the category "People of the Romanian Revolution of 1989" and which are the sources to support that?--MariusM 20:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Andreescu Critique" Legitimacy edit

The section, first and foremost, should not be a 'section'. It should, at most, be integrated somewhere in the article’s main body of text. Furthermore, I see no real bibliographical sustenance behind Andreescu's attack, which appears biographically-informed and thus verging close to illegitimacy. Clearly Liiceanu's philosophical/intellectual legacy - as one of Paltinis School's main contemporary exponent - should be expounded on! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.76.253.186 (talk) 11:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

How's mass marketing of fascist propaganda irrelevant? Wir haben es nicht gewusst would be a very lame excuse for him not knowing what his publishing house did year after year. Tgeorgescu (talk) 12:51, 10 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

"Andreescu Critique" edit

If the section should legitimately be deleted, then it needs to be discussed here for consensus first. Arbitrary section blanking gets anti-vandalism reverts, as can be seen from the edit history.

Revent (talk) 08:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply