| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
In short, don't post obviously personal information. Danielfong 08:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Why doesn't this article have basic information, such as his birth date and place?
WP: Notability edit
These articles all follow the same generic template: blah blah is a winner of (insert contest here), (insert contest here), and (insert contest here). Attended/is attending (insert university here) from (year) to (year) etc.
No doubt IMO, Putnam, etc. are significant competitions. But do we really need a separate article for every such winner? Might as well wait until they become professors and have actually published some papers, or made some other contribution to academia/society instead of simply winning a contest. Not to mention that these contests are directed towards the undergraduate/high school level.
See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tiankai_Liu and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yi_Sun for other similar articles that passed AfD and were deleted for non-notability.
- Wikipedian06 07:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Carroll seemingly satisfies the Academic Notability criterion 6: The person has received a notable award or honor, or has been often nominated for them. He "actually" did publish a paper called "the cube recurrence" with D Speyer. Debivort 10:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Not everybody who publishes a paper or wins some undergraduate prize is notable. Gabriel Carroll is a good example of a person who is famous in a specific crowd (math competition people) and is essentially unknown outside of that crowd; this is not considered notable in Wikipedia. Doubtless one day he will be, but he's not there yet. 128.36.41.44 (talk) 18:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with this line of thinking. These articles are written from what appears to be self-promotion. I believe that listing award winners for mathematics competitions is a warranted inclusion, but giving them each a page where they list all of their life's accomplishments (none of which would meet the Wikipedia's notability guideline) is unwarranted. Avangion (talk) 17:49, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Not everybody who publishes a paper or wins some undergraduate prize is notable. Gabriel Carroll is a good example of a person who is famous in a specific crowd (math competition people) and is essentially unknown outside of that crowd; this is not considered notable in Wikipedia. Doubtless one day he will be, but he's not there yet. 128.36.41.44 (talk) 18:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
This particular discussion is pretty much a word-for-word clone of the discussion at Talk:Reid W. Barton. Why not just discuss everything there instead of editing in a message two times? Temperalxy 19:44, 23 November 2007 (UTC)