Talk:GRTC Pulse

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2600:4040:1203:5D00:2432:890E:D66A:7142 in topic Incidents
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GRTC Pulse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Incidents

edit

I am proposing to remove the "Incidents" section, but I am putting it on Talk first to solicit opinions. It is not typical to include isolated incidents on transportation pages in Virginia or elsewhere. For instance, the pages List of Interstate Highways in Virginia or Transportation in Virginia do not include the thousands of automotive traffic deaths (they probably should) to say nothing of accidents. Many of the "incidents" listed here could just as easily be listed under those pages, since they were caused by cars, not by the GRTC / Pulse system. A section on isolated incidents could be replaced by a section addressing "safety" or even "criticism," but it would need to be written carefully with comparisons to automobile transit. As it stands this section is terribly misleading given that public transit is far safer than the alternative (automobile use). (I am proposing to the eliminate the incidents section in the Pulse article as well).

don.s.okeefe (talk) 14:50, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Agree with this. 2600:4040:1203:5D00:2432:890E:D66A:7142 (talk) 16:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply