Talk:GABA receptor antagonist

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Stevia badger in topic Merger proposal

What in God's name...

edit

"GABA receptor antagonists are good because"

Good "at", "for", "because" - no idea, perhaps just plain "unqualified good".

This is science & biochemistry not morality & philosophy. James James 173 (talk) 07:19, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit

It is claimed that this article cannot be expanded to a traditionally non-stub length without creating significant redundancy in the GABA and Receptor antagonist pages.

Therefore, it should be merged with a subsection of at least one of those articles to avoid unnecessary division of content.

The specifics of the merger are left unspecified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevia badger (talkcontribs) 19:17, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply