Talk:Günther Specht/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   If you're going to use German terms please follow German capitalization rules for nouns like Viermot, Staffel, etc.  Done

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Page numbers are not needed for references.  Done

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   if: Need to explain what II./JG 11 and 5./JG 11 mean when they first appear. Probably best done as a note. Explain Geschwaderkommodore.  Done

   This is currently done in the main body, but not in the lead. Please explain the terms there and delete the links and explanations in the main body to avoid duplication and overlinking.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC) Done

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: