Talk:Fur Affinity

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 16 December 2023, see discussion.
delete, 6 June 2006, see discussion.

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Furry Mid‑importance

	Fur Affinity is within the scope of WikiProject Furry, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to furry fandom. For more information, visit the project page.FurryWikipedia:WikiProject FurryTemplate:WikiProject Furryfurry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Valid sources.

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

are links to twitter and furaffinity really valid sources for the website creators death? What's next? Reddit posts as a valid source? Come on. Without a real source, y'all might be falling for an elaborate April fools joke. BadMombo1660 (talk) 19:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

2024 Hack sources

Latest comment: 21 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

As of this writing, sources on Fur Affinity's recovery from the hack are hard to come by. Most of the updates about the situation come from their official Discord server, which we generally do not consider to be reliable. Please bear with us while we look for third-party resources. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 18:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

There's this one on Flayrah, though it's not all that much more than a summation of events. (Our story about Dragoneer's death lists many more comprehensive stories about FA.) GreenReaper (talk) 23:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Undue emphasis on 2024 hack?

Latest comment: 22 days ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I'm wondering if the 2024 hack really warrants its own section. Does this event stand out more than other site attacks such as the 2016 source code leak or the times that it was brought down by DDOS attacks? TornadoLGS (talk) 19:27, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think it happening so soon after the owner died (and likely being possible because of that) brought more attention than usual. Plus there's probably just more attention on furries now that isn't just mocking. Ringtail Raider (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

We'll probably condense that section to mention that the site was hacked in August 2024, but remove most of the details. The section was being updated near-real-time while the event was in progress, partly to mitigate any damage that might be done if someone followed a link to the site during the event. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 18:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic