Talk:Fullback (rugby league)

Argument about numbers?

I wasn't aware there was one. I'm also unaware of what's "traditional" about fullback being numbered 1.--Gibson Flying V (talk) 03:58, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I made edits to the Hooker article first so if you didn't see my edit description there this one wouldn't make sense. I like the paragraph you included; "Traditionally the hooker's jersey number has varied and in the modern Super League, each squad's players are assigned individual jersey numbers regardless of position. However, the Rugby League International Federation's Laws of the Game state that the hooker is to be numbered 9." So something similar here would address my concern. Mattlore (talk) 04:16, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Sweet as.--Gibson Flying V (talk) 04:45, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fullback (rugby league). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5mjIw6P0s?url=http://www.nma.gov.au/shared/libraries/attachments/league_of_legends/rugby_league_a_work_in_progress/files/22453/F_RL_work_in_progress.pdf to http://www.nma.gov.au/shared/libraries/attachments/league_of_legends/rugby_league_a_work_in_progress/files/22453/F_RL_work_in_progress.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)