Talk:Full Disclosure (The West Wing)/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic GA Reassessment

GA Reassessment

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Prose isn't very good, but more importantly, full of speculation that would be WP:OR if it weren't cited to completely unreliable sources like The West Wing Episode Guide. This was promoted in '07, it's fallen below GA standards since then. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/she) 20:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing

edit
  • The West Wing Episode Guide isn't a reliable source, but its used to support a significant amount of extra-plot interpretation
  • The timing of the episode, however, was fortuitous, in that it coincided with the much-publicised Drudge story about presidential candidate John Kerry's alleged affair with a journalist. without sourcing to support the connection, this is WP:SYNTH

Prose

edit
  • In the final paragraph, pointing out violates MOS:NOTED
  • Curly quotes and apostrophes abound
  • "clear" is used twice in quick succession in the second plot paragraph
  • Washington, D.C. needs a geocomma
  • (Pickens) full name not mentioned in the body

Broadness

edit
  • Contains no mention of episode's reception

Overall

edit

Pinging @Lampman and The Giant Puffin as GA nominator and reviewer. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 20:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply