Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 October 2021 and 9 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Damonmand.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Demographics

edit

Of all province of china pages, only Fujian has a sentence dealing with genetic studies. Are there similar studies for other provinces? Hanfresco 09:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hangzhou

edit

Are you sure it is Hangzhou (not a port) and not Hanzhou, as was written before, which is a port city in Guangdong province, just as Guangzhou? olivier 09:09 Jan 17, 2003 (UTC)

I put Hanzhou as the English word for 杭州 at first but change to hangzhou as the latter term is the Pinyin transliteration. Hangzhou was a port but now is not because its harbour was silted up. I would also like to know about Hanzhou the port city in Guangdong. You can say something about it in Guangdong the wikipedia article. User:kt2
I am actually not sure about the transliteration of "Hanzhou". I just remember hearing of such a harbor city near Hong Kong. I will add related information it I find some. On the other hand, I have added the information you gave above regarding Hangzhou's harbor in the city's article. olivier 13:49 Jan 19, 2003 (UTC)

Should a table of facts of the Fukien or Fuchien Province under ROC's jurisdiction be added?

Clarification

edit

This article is not very clear about the differences between Fujian and Fukien/Fuchien. I think it needs split up, with a seperate article on each, and a clear explanation of which refers to what. Cripipper 14:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Quemoy is now Kinmen

edit

The archipalego of Quemoy is officially known as Kinmen in Taiwan, so I've changed the article to reflect this.

Proposal for Hanji-based Hokkien Wikipedia

edit

Please leave comments at [1].

122.109.171.138 (talk) 04:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fujian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:17, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fujian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Postal romanization

edit

Could you please justify the recent trend of adding postal romanizations and non-standard eye dialect spellings of Chinese place names? A redirect or a brief mentioning is enough, but using the bold font and putting them in the introduction table is too much. They are not "alternate romanizations", they're obsolete, arbitrary and inconsistent, only differing in a letter or two because authors didn't have a standard to work with. Wikipedia is thus conducting original research, making the spellings more popular than ever, which is against Wikipedia policies. --2001:16B8:316F:4E00:40A:B738:AAD8:2479 (talk) 22:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Topmost table has incorrect formatting

edit

It doesn't show in the web version of the article's webpage, but in the Wikipedia app article's upper Quick Facts table (specifically, the button you click to drop it down) looks like this:

Quick Facts: • .mw-parser-output .nobold{font-weight:normal}Chinese, • .mw-parser-output .nobold{font-weight:normal}Abbreviation...

When it should only display just "Quick Facts:"

Chances are, the formatting is simply missing a curly bracket somewhere, but I don't know enough about Wikipedia's markup language to find it. The lower Quick Facts table is fine though, and thus could serve as a comparison to find the error in the upper one. OlliverWithDoubleL (talk) 08:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Fu-chien County" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Fu-chien County has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 23 § Fu-chien County until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 11:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply