Talk:Frozan Fana
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI would have thought that any presidential candidate could be notable, particularly a woman candidate in a country like Afghanistan. PatGallacher (talk) 01:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- She's definitely not a candidate for speedy deletion, that's for sure. The article could use expansion, though. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 01:42, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- That, alone, is not a claim of notability. There were over 1000 claimed presidential candidates in the United States in 2008, and probably over 400 who were actually on the ballot in some state. They're not all notable. Perhaps not speedy, but there is certainly not much of a claim of notability. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:50, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Afghanistan's only had one election previously, and having a woman lead the country would probably cause heart attacks in 1/3 of the populace. So it's not quite the same as American elections. :P I agree, though, it needs more sourcing; BLP1E and all. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 03:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- That, alone, is not a claim of notability. There were over 1000 claimed presidential candidates in the United States in 2008, and probably over 400 who were actually on the ballot in some state. They're not all notable. Perhaps not speedy, but there is certainly not much of a claim of notability. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:50, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Comment
edit<ref name=Sabawoon> {{cite news | url=http://www.sabawoon.com/index.php?page=afghanelection | title=Preliminary Result of Afghanistan Presidential Contest | date=2009-08-20 | author= | publisher=[[Sabawoon online]] | archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sabawoon.com%2Findex.php%3Fpage%3Dafghanelection&date=2009-08-30 | archivedate=2009-08-30 }}</ref>
WRT to Fana's share of the popular vote...
Someone added that Fana got less than .5 % of the popular vote.
name | votes | percent votes |
cumulative |
---|---|---|---|
Zia-ul-haq Hafizi | 724 | 0.035607 | 0.035607 |
Abdul Majid Samim | 998 | 0.049082 | 0.084689 |
Hidayat Amin Arsala | 1067 | 0.052476 | 0.137165 |
Sangin Mohammad Rahmani | 1138 | 0.055968 | 0.193133 |
Bashir Ahmad Bizhan | 1272 | 0.062558 | 0.255691 |
Mohammad Akbar Oria | 1353 | 0.066542 | 0.322232 |
Gul Ahmmad Yama | 1434 | 0.070525 | 0.392758 |
Zabih-U-llah Ghazi Noristani | 1516 | 0.074558 | 0.467316 |
Engineer Moin-ul-din Ulfati | 1645 | 0.080902 | 0.548218 |
Abdul Hasib Arian | 2027 | 0.099689 | 0.647907 |
Bismillah Shir | 2179 | 0.107165 | 0.755072 |
Dr Ghulam Faroq Nijrabi | 2240 | 0.110165 | 0.865237 |
Mulla Ghulam Mohammad Rigi | 2240 | 0.110165 | 0.975402 |
Mohammad Hashim Tawfiqi | 2406 | 0.118329 | 1.093731 |
Abdul Jabar Sabit | 2560 | 0.125903 | 1.219634 |
Haji Rahim Jan Shinzad | 3118 | 0.153346 | 1.372980 |
Mohammad Sarwar Ahmadzai | 4028 | 0.198100 | 1.571080 |
Shahla Ata | 4356 | 0.214231 | 1.785311 |
Alhaj Abdul Ghafor Zori | 4955 | 0.243691 | 2.029002 |
Sayed Jalal Karim | 5572 | 0.274035 | 2.303037 |
Mahbob-U-lah Koshani | 5755 | 0.283035 | 2.586072 |
Abdul Latif Pedram | 7311 | 0.359561 | 2.945633 |
Dr Habib Mangal | 7339 | 0.360938 | 3.306571 |
Motasim Billah Mazhabi | 7841 | 0.385626 | 3.692197 |
Dr Frozan Fana | 8159 | 0.401266 | 4.093463 |
Mulla Abdul Salam Rakity | 8250 | 0.405741 | 4.499205 |
Shahnawaz Tanai | 13512 | 0.664531 | 5.163735 |
Mirwais Yasini | 23059 | 1.134059 | 6.297794 |
Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai | 48375 | 2.379120 | 8.676914 |
Ramazan Bashardost | 277404 | 13.642943 | 22.319857 |
Dr Abdullah Abdullah | 638924 | 31.422775 | 53.742632 |
Hamed Karzai | 940558 | 46.257368 | 100.000000 |
So, the top 3 candidates got 91.3 % of the vote, and the bottom 29 shared 8.68 % between them.
The top 7 candidates got 96 perecent of the vote. Fana shared 4 percent of the vote with 24 other candidates.
The initial Sabawoon voting results should be replaced with later, more definitive results. Geo Swan (talk) 04:00, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- So? That wouldn't be relevant in an election where elections are common. You'd need to make a special case for this election for anything other than the statement that she was 8th with less than 0.5%. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:29, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- I did the math because your addition surprised me. I found 0.5% a surprising number.
- How relevant is it? I don't know. I thought other contributors who also wondered might benefit from the work I did generating those statistics.
- I don't know what you mean about "making a case". I don't think I have to "make a case" to include rough work, relevant to the content of the article, on its talk page. Do you think I do? Geo Swan (talk) 15:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see any reason to accumulate the votes. Less than 0.5% is correct, although the rank and a more precise count (if the count were reliable) would be reasonable. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:23, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Frozan Fana election symbol.jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Frozan Fana election symbol.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Frozan Fana election symbol.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC) |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Frozan Fana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=94888§ionid=351020403
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://zeldalily.com/index.php/category/frozan-fana/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.internews.org/prs/2009/20090513_afghan.shtm
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/681650
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=111349105
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i-UmwryIsQh6f1HpnLsKuCBbG7xgD99SS3U80
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gJqqwsD5Y0A7kZPyMt0eXKx3RpVw
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sabawoon.com/index.php?page=afghanelection
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20011129022125/http://www.frozan.org/ to http://www.frozan.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)