Talk:Fritz the Cat/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I shall be reviewing this page against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Quick fail criteria assessment
- The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
- The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
- There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
- The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
- The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
No obvious problems found when checking against the quick fail criteria, moving on the substantive review. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
- Well written. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- b (MoS):
- Conforms with MoS sufficiently. I de-wikilinked Robin Hood as this goes to the folk hero, which doesn't seem right. If I got this wrong, please re-link. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:38, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
- All on-line references are live. References that I have been able to check are OK. Assume GF for the print sources. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- b (citations to reliable sources):
I don't think we can categorize ref #9 [1]. It looks like a variety of wiki. On further investigation it appears that Markstein is an authority on comics and graphic novels, so OK for the statement it supports. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- c (OR):
- No evidence of OR. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- a (references):
- It is broad in its scope.
- a (major aspects):
- b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- OK, I believe this meets the Good Article criteria so, I am passing it to GA status. Congratulations.
- Pass/Fail: