Talk:Friends (Swedish band)

Untitled

I provided several second-hand sources, as requested. Why then delete it again? Mackan 12:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

The sources need to be properly formatted, and the claims in the article really ought to be attributed to who said them in which source. If this had been done before the AfD closed, I wouldn't have deleted it - assuming the sources really back up what is said. Like I said in closing it, WP:V is not negotiable.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I forgot to say you really shouldn't have recreated it like this in the mainspace. You should have done it in your user space at a subpage like User:Mackan/Friends (group) or something, then we could decide if it should be recreated or not. Right now it will probably be speedy deleted as a recreation of deleted material.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I have no interest in maintaining this page, and I have no interest in writing more detailed about the group "Friends" (I don't like their music, I've never had any interest in them whatsoever - but I know of them). I didn't bother searching for sources at first because I didn't really care that much, and I didn't think it would end up being deleted. When you deleted it I decided to put some sources in, and that's all the vfd nominator ever demanded. Why do you then suggest that this will be speedily deleted? That doesn't make any sense. Also, creating this article in my namespace would not make any sense either. Of course, WP:V isn't negotiable, but instead of deleting it, how about putting a bunch of "references"-tags or something on it instead? I mean, for one thing, there are articles on three other Wiki's about this group, shouldn't that have been some kind of indication of notability??

The sources I've provided are probably not enough to cover every single statement in the article, but they do establish that the band is notable enough. Sure, they ought to be formatted properly, but this is in my opinion more than enough to not delete the article again. Also, could you please just restore the page as it were and put the sources at the bottom? Mackan 15:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I said it might be deleted as a recreation of deleted material, which it is. If you wanted it undeleted you should have gone to WP:DRV or asked me or another admin to undelete it. As to why I deleted it, no one had provided references by the time the AfD closed (and it closed several days late) so it looked to me that there weren't going to be any sources to prove WP:V, let alone notability (and the articles in other languages could have been just as poor as ours). I'll restore the page, but this is already far more time than I wish anyone had ever spent on this group.--Cúchullain ^t/c 15:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:FriendsLyssna.JPG

The image Image:FriendsLyssna.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Friends (Swedish band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050315181041/http://www.underholdningsnettet.dk:80/friends.htm to http://www.underholdningsnettet.dk/friends.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Friends (Swedish band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313044616/http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/noje/story/0,2789,956412,00.html to http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/noje/story/0,2789,956412,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)